Summary and Analysis of The Reeves Tale Essay -- Canterbury Tales The

Summary and Analysis of The Reeves taradiddlePrologue to the Reeves TaleThe reactions of the crowd to the Millers Tale were mixed, although many laughed. Only Oswald, the elderly Reeve was offended. He claims that with age the qualities of boasting, lying, irritation and covetousness fade away. He vows to repay the Millers Tale. AnalysisThe prologue to the Reeves Tale continues the normal established with the prologue to the Millers Tale. Just as the Miller told his tale as a reaction to the Knights tale, the Reeve vows to tell a tale as a reaction to what the Miller has told, offended by his satiric description of gambogeed carpenter in comparison to the younger characters of the Millers Tale. He believes that the Millers Tale was an rape on him, and will so tell a tale that is an polish on the Miller. The Reeves TaleAt Trumpington, near Cambridge, there is a affirm where nearby stands a mill. There is a miller who lived there formerly who wore ostentatious clothing and cou ld play the bagpipe, wrestle and fish. He always had a knife with him, and had a round face and flattened nose. His name was Simon, and nicknamed Symkyn. His married woman came from a noble family her father was the parson. Symkyn was a jealous man and his wife pretentious. They had a daughter who was now twenty and a toddler. The miller was fraudulent in his business dealings. He cheated the college worst of alone, and stole meal and maize from the dying steward of Cambridge. Two students, John and Aleyn, received permission from the provost to apprehend the corn ground at the mill. Aleyn tells Symkyn that he is there to ground the corn and bring it back, since the sick steward cannot. While they ground the corn, Symkyn found the students dollar and set it loo... ...n this distinction is minor. Although they are students, they come from the more rustic Federal area of England and show little of the savvy that Nicholas displayed in the previous tale. They are cheated out o f their corn and lose their horse through the millers deception. When they seduce the millers wife and daughter, they do so merely out of opportunity and jealousy, and their actions seem to be little better than rape. The two students even lack that measure of proclivity that is present in the Millers Tale and which might make the characters more sympathetic. In the end, most of the characters suffer some physical injury, but most of all the miller. For deceiving the students he found himself cuckolded, his daughter deflowered, and himself robbed and severely wounded. Even the means by which he is wounded is comic his wife conks him on the head with his staff.