The Confederate Flag Essay -- Flag Argumentative Persuasive Paperes

The confederative pin tumblerOn January 1992 the NAACP put in affect a boycott on South Carolina to pressure the state to remove the quisling yield glowering of its Statehouse in Columbia. The boycott is what initially brought life to this issue. The NAACPs removal involve is based on the fact that they, the anti- personal identification number groups, claim that the meaning of the Confederate let up is one of hate and discrimination. On the new(prenominal) hand, there are other groups that believe differently whom are called the pro-flag groups. They claim that the Confederate flag is a sign of heritage and should stay on South Carolinas Statehouse. Anti-flag articles are more likely to be found published in well-known(a) Liberal magazines, when credible pro-flag articles were hard to find. The main issue of the debate, which is a rendering argument, includes one that argues the meaning of the Confederate flag and what it stands for, and from it many arguments stem that exercise up the intense debate about the Confederate flag. The Civil warfare being about slavery is one of the first things addressed in both types of articles. Within this argument, the pro-flag groups claim that many blacks fought for the Confederacy. Then the Confederate flags connection with racism is then argued. An anti-flag argument to prove that the Confederate flag is connected to slavery is that it was raised in response to the urbane rights movement that was going on in 1961. Another anti-flag argument is that the Confederate flag does not represent the State as a social unit and for that reason should not be flown on South Carolinas Statehouse. An nevertheless amount of pathos and logos is used among the opposing groups, but the anti-flag articles incline to have more ethical appeal and fewer flaws in their a... ...ision by figuring out which side has the strongest one and therefore the more warrant cause.Work CitedEric Foner. Rebel Yell. The Nation. 270.6 (February 14, 2000) 4.James F. Barker. Clemson History Offers Perspective for Flag Debate. The State. celestial latitude 3, 2000.Stuart Taylor Jr. The Confederate Flag and the Cost of Pandering. National Journal. 32.4 (January 22, 2000) 215.Walter E. Williams. No Critics of the flag are Counting on a General Ignoranceof History to take out Their Case. Symposium. March 14, 2001. http//www.insightmag.com/archive/200002064.shtmlQuick, Steven. Lynching Lee The Opinions. 2/27/2001Http//www.palmetto.org/noprint.htm Amy. all the same more on the confederate Flag vs. the Xian usage debates. Parentsplace.com. February 02,2000 wysiwyg//4http//boards2.parentsplace.com/messages/ adopt/ppcurrentdebates63/26.html