Policy Analysis Paper/CJA/464 Essay

Policy is a large part of policing in the get together States. Policy helps countersink law, and law helps keep order amid the chaos if compel properly. But every policy moldiness be looked at conservatively before, during and after enforcement to make sure that policy is and continues to be the best total for the issues at hand. Sometimes looking at two policies and comparing them posterior help welcome a solution in the middle. It is important to beget a policy a realistic goal, to accomplish in a realistic time in order to mold protrude if it was really effective or not.Crime Control Model/ Due turn Model Crime check up on model arranges emphasis on development more police and harder court sentences to help deter and hopefully debase curse. It utilizes the magnates held by the establishment to protect the people, with limited regards to their dears (Sociology Index, 2013). It favors tougher punishment to crimes and on the criminals that practise them. Crime Con trol model urges that sometimes, persons should give up their rights, to protect and nearlybeing society as a whole. Often people are fictional to be guilty until proven irreproachable.Due Process tries to focus on the rights of the exclusives and limiting the power held by the government. People that wish to limit government tend to favor the due process model over the crime control model. In the due process model, people are unsophisticated until proven guilty, and are not adequately punished until their guilt is well established through the criminal justice system. Each model has their place in our criminal justice system, having two strengths and weaknesses. As society changes, the models must be willing to trade off to adapt to the crime conditions for that time.both embrace some aspects of the core values of the constitution, and while the ways they kindle work together are few, they do wipe out their moments. Policies/ Opinion The jump Search of Information Policy is a policy set onward in 2008 which allows Border Patrol agents the ability to search and seize both printed and electronic materials and devices without needing a warrant or probable cause (CPB, 2008). If an individual is going through a check point or both Border Patrol station, the officers may choose to pull them aside for a random inspection.During the course of that inspection they may go through all and all electronic and printed items (ACLU, 2013). ICE and Department of Homeland Security feature similar policies. These policies all seem to throw out the fourth amendment which states The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be go against, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.(Fourth Amendment, 1789) Some argue that this is a necessa ry right to forgo, to stop such things as squirt pornography, or links to terrorism (DHS, 2014). I have even hear the excuse of If you have nothing to hide, it shouldnt be a problem. I respectfully have to disagree, quoting Benjamin Franklin They who would give up essential Liberty, to leverage a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. (Franklin). before long this policy seems to favor crime control, and not due process, violating peoples rights without just cause. Roles of the Courts The courts play a few utilizations in this policy. One role is as they are prosecuting the violations several cases might get thrown out due to the constitutionality of the search. Courts have the power to look at this policy, and try to find a way to fix the constitutional rights that are being violated within before people that deserve to get punished, get set free to continue their illegal activities.If this does not change, many more innocent people maybe hurt as their righ ts are violated essay to attempt to catch people that will try to get external with a crime any way they can. Some may opine they have nothing to hide, that theyve done nothing wrong, only to be caught because in a text message they talk about something private that may raise questions in the eyes of the officer. Conclusion . The people need to agnize that they are going to be innocent until proven guilty and they have to trust that the government always has their best interest in mind.This includes holding their essential constitutional rights in mind, and protecting them from possible abuse of power by officers who feel above the law. Due process and Crime control models do have their place, and the countrys courts must attempt to find a balance between the rights of the individuals and the protection of society. By analyzing the policies at hand, and establishing take place boundaries ensures that the criminals are caught the correct way, and the rights of the innocent peop le are left undamaged.