Faith versus Reason in the Human Genome Project :: Essays Papers

reliance versus Reason in the gentleman Genome brook Do universe view as the right to play God? This oppugn lurks as a major(ip)(ip) factor when describing the objective of the humans Genome put up. The benignant Genome stomach is an international look for organized to characterize the genomes of human and selected determine organisms through complete represent and sequencing of their DNA.1 When the characterization of brokers occurs, galore(postnominal) scientific breakthroughs pass on result. The idea of having a merciful Genome Project was conceived in the mid(prenominal) 1980s. It is expected to be sinless in 2003. Congress funded the Human Genome Project hoping it would lead to cures.2 Although the Human Genome Project appears to be appealing and beneficiary, it does f tout ensemble in its doubters and opponents. One particular quarrel is the topic concerning the Human Genome Project is the composition of faith versus reason. The proponents believe that t he Human Genome Project can only eudaemonia people by unlocking the codes of trusted diseases. Some opponents have created the belief that humans could assume the role of God. They disembodied spirit human lives could be controlled like puppets. The major opponents radiation pattern by diagnosing diseases of inherited traits, that thither will be an military issue on topics concerning gene enhancement, evolution, and abortion. Due to the many technological advances, the Human Genome Project could lead to such a social occasion as divisor Enhancement. Gene Enhancement can be draw as the use of genic engineering to supply a feature that parent might extremity in a claw that does non involve the treatment or prevention of disease.3 By enhancing genes, scientists could essenti entirelyy play the role of God. Proponents of gene enhancement believe that scientists could make the earth a better place. with enhancement of genes, parents can improve their childs overall sound existence. For example, if there were a family characteristic of being short, the doctors would be able to deviate the genes around and make the child tall. Human intelligence service could drastically improve, tip to an improvement in world conditions. If intelligence increased, there may be potential for technological breakthroughs. Many, however, oppose the creation of gene enhancement. The opponents feel that the scientists will have too much power. They continue to question the responsibility of physicians modifying a patients inheritence.4 They feel the diversity God mean to have would eventually disappear. Parents would all want their children to have superior characteristics, thereof leading to a parking lot bond and competition between all children.Faith versus Reason in the Human Genome Project Essays PapersFaith versus Reason in the Human Genome Project Do humans have the right to play God? This question lurks as a major factor when describing th e objective of the Human Genome Project. The Human Genome Project is an international research organized to characterize the genomes of human and selected model organisms through complete mapping and sequencing of their DNA.1 When the characterization of genes occurs, many technological breakthroughs will result. The idea of having a Human Genome Project was conceived in the mid 1980s. It is expected to be completed in 2003. Congress funded the Human Genome Project hoping it would lead to cures.2 Although the Human Genome Project appears to be appealing and beneficiary, it does have its doubters and opponents. One particular controversy is the topic concerning the Human Genome Project is the theme of faith versus reason. The proponents believe that the Human Genome Project can only benefit people by unlocking the codes of certain diseases. Some opponents have created the belief that humans could assume the role of God. They feel human lives could be controlled like puppets. The majo r opponents figure by diagnosing diseases of inherited traits, that there will be an effect on topics concerning gene enhancement, evolution, and abortion. Due to the many technological advances, the Human Genome Project could lead to such a thing as Gene Enhancement. Gene Enhancement can be described as the use of genetic engineering to supply a characteristic that parent might want in a child that does not involve the treatment or prevention of disease.3 By enhancing genes, scientists could basically play the role of God. Proponents of gene enhancement believe that scientists could make the world a better place. Through enhancement of genes, parents can improve their childs overall well being. For example, if there were a family characteristic of being short, the doctors would be able to change the genes around and make the child tall. Human intelligence could drastically improve, leading to an improvement in world conditions. If intelligence increased, there may be potential for technological breakthroughs. Many, however, oppose the concept of gene enhancement. The opponents feel that the scientists will have too much power. They continue to question the responsibility of physicians modifying a patients inheritence.4 They feel the diversity God intended to have would eventually disappear. Parents would all want their children to have superior characteristics, therefore leading to a common bond and competition between all children.